Cases 31 - 40 of 52
United States of America et al v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv05389
Defendant:
Astellas Pharma, Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Impax Laboratories, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
District of Columbia, John Radice, State of California and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
United States of America et al v. DJO Global Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv07152
Defendant:
Biomet, Inc., DJO Finance LLC, DJO Global Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
District of Columbia, Russ Milko, Doris Modglin and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
State of Missouri, et al v. Kamala Harris, et al
as 14-17111
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STATE OF MISSOURI, ex rel. Chris Koster, Attorney General, STATE OF NEBRASKA, ex rel. Jon Bruning, Attorney General, STATE OF OKLAHOMA, ex rel. E. Scott Pruitt, Attorney General and others
Defendant - Appellee:
KAMALA D. HARRIS, Attorney General, in her official capacity as Attorney General of the State of California and KAREN ROSS, in her official capacity as Secretary of the California Department of Food and Agriculture
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellee:
HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE UNITED STATES and ASSOCIATION OF CALIFORNIA EGG FARMERS
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF UTAH, AMERICAN FARM BUREAU FEDERATION, ANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND and others
In re Lidoderm Antitrust Litigation
as 3:2014md02521
Plaintiff:
United Food and Commercial Workers Local 1776 & Participating Employers Health and Welfare Fund, Plumbers & Pipefitters Local 178 Health & Welfare Trust Fund, Local 17 Hospitality Benefit Fund and others
Defendant:
Teikoku Pharma USA, Teikoku Seiyaku Co, Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc and others
Not Classified By Court:
All Parties, Express Scripts, Inc., Caremark, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
State of Missouri, et al v. Harris
as 2:2014cv00341
Defendant:
Kamala D. Harris and Karen Ross
Plaintiff:
State of Missouri , State of Nebraska , State of Alabama and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Beverly Sevcik, et al v. Brian Sandoval, et al
as 12-17668
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF INDIANA, STATE OF ALABAMA; STATE OF ALASKA; STATE OF ARIZONA; STATE OF COLORADO; STATE OF IDAHO; STATE OF MONTANA; STATE OF NEBRASKA; STATE OF OKLAHOMA; STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA; and STATE OF UTAH, COLAGE, HAWAII PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CAREN CAFFERATA-JENKINS, GREG FLAMER, SARA GEIGER and others
Defendant / Appellee:
BRIAN E. SANDOVAL, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of Nevada, AMY HARVEY, in her official capacity as the County Clerk and Commissioner of Civil Marriages for Washoe County, Nevada, DIANA ALBA, in her official capacity as the County Clerk and Commissioner of Civil Marriages for Clark County, Nevada and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
COALITION FOR THE PROTECTION OF MARRIAGE
The State of California et al v. Mitsubishi Electric Corporation et al
as 3:2012cv05229
Plaintiff:
The State of California , The State of Arizona , The State of Arkansas and others
Defendant:
Mitsubishi Electric Corporation and Mitsubishi Electric & Electronics USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
The State of California by its Attorney General Kamala D. Harris and the City and County of San Francisco Ex Rel Dennis J. Herrera, The County of Santa Clara, and Los Angeles Unified School District o et al v. Toshiba Corporation et al
as 3:2012cv05230
Plaintiff:
The State of California by its Attorney General Kamala D. Harris and the City and County of San Francisco Ex Rel Dennis J. Herrera, The County of Santa Clara, and Los Angeles Unified School District o , The State of Arizona by its Attorney GeneralTom Horne , The State of Arkansas by its Attorney General Dustin McDaniel and others
Defendant:
Toshiba Corporation and Toshiba America Electronic Components, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
The State of California et al v. Hitachi, Ltd. et al
as 3:2012cv05231
Plaintiff:
The State of California , The State of Arizona , The State of Arkansas and others
Defendant:
Hitachi, Ltd. and Hitachi America, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
George Mothershed, I v. State of Oklahoma, et al
as 12-16671
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GEORGE LLOYD MOTHERSHED, I, pro se
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF OKLAHOMA, ex rel Oklahoma Bar Association, STEVEN W. TAYLOR, the Honorable Chief Justice, TOM J. COLBERT, the Honorable Vice-Chief Justice and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
