Cases 41 - 50 of 2,863
Fergason v. Johnson, et al.
as 24-2233
Petitioner:
BRYAN MICHAEL FERGASON
Respondent:
CALVIN JOHNSON, CHARLES DANIELS and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
United States of America v. Johnson
as 24-2035
Defendant:
ROBERT WESLEY JOHNSON, Bogart, Tiny Bogart and others
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Blake v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, et al.
as 24-1791
Plaintiff:
LESTER PHILLIP BLAKE, JR.
Defendant:
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, D. GODFREY, Correctional Sergeant, Invidual, Correctional Officer D. BARBOUR, individual and others
Shreves v. Godfrey, et al.
as 24-1692
Plaintiff:
RICHARD E. SHREVES
Defendant:
DEMETRIC GODFREY, CRYSTAL THOMPSON, BRIAN GOOTKIN and others
Harris v. Ely State Prison Staff, et al.
as 24-1699
Defendant / Appellee:
WILLIAM REUBART
Plaintiff:
AMMAR HARRIS
Defendant:
ELY STATE PRISON STAFF, STEVEN SISOLAK, BARBARA CEGAVSKE and others
Shue v. Attorney General of the State of Nevada, et al.
as 24-1665
Petitioner:
JOSHUA CALEB SHUE
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, CALVIN JOHNSON and JEREMY BEAN
Keene, et al. v. City and County of San Francisco, et al.
as 24-1574
Plaintiff:
SELINA KEENE, MARK MCCLURE, MELODY FOUNTILA and others
Defendant:
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, LONDON BREED, CAROL ISEN and others
Epperson v. Deutsche Bank et al
as 1:2024cv00286
Plaintiff:
Chris Epperson
Defendant:
Deutsche Bank, Lyndon B Johnson, Hary S. Truman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00432
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Kenneth K. Henderson v. Irvine Unified School District
as 5:2024cv00476
Defendant:
Randy Walker, Janet Walker, Irvine Unified School District and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth K. Henderson
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
