Cases 41 - 50 of 92
State of Washington et al v. United States Department of State et al
as 2:2020cv00111
Defendant:
United States Department of Commerce, Michael R. Pompeo, U.S. State Department and others
Plaintiff:
State of North Carolina, State of Minnesota, State of Maryland and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
State of Washington, et al v. Defense Distributed, et al
as 20-35030
Plaintiff / Appellee:
STATE OF COLORADO, STATE OF ILLINOIS, STATE OF NEW YORK and others
Defendant / Appellant:
DEFENSE DISTRIBUTED
Defendant:
DIRECTORATE OF DEFENSE TRADE CONTROLS, US DEPARTMENT OF STATE, MIKE MILLER, in his official capacity as Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense Trade Controls and others
State of California, et al v. Donald Trump, et al
as 20-15044
Defendant / Appellee:
MARK T. ESPER, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary of Defense, KEVIN K. MCALEENAN, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary of Homeland Security, RYAN D. MCCARTHY, senior official performing the duties of the Secretary of the Army and others
Plaintiff:
STATE OF MINNESOTA, STATE OF CONNECTICUT, STATE OF VERMONT and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, STATE OF NEW MEXICO, STATE OF COLORADO and others
Amicus Curiae:
FORMER U.S. GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS, EL PASO COUNTY, FORMER MEMBERS OF CONGRESS and others
State of California, et al v. Donald Trump, et al
as 19-17502
Plaintiff / Appellee:
STATE OF COLORADO, STATE OF ILLINOIS, STATE OF NEW YORK and others
Defendant / Appellant:
DAVID BERNHARDT, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Interior, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, RICHARD V. SPENCER, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Navy and others
Amicus Curiae:
ANDY BARR, U.S. Representative
The Dan Abrams Company LLC, et al v. Medtronic Inc., et al
as 19-56377
Plaintiff:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, STATE OF NEVADA, STATE OF FLORIDA and others
Defendant / Appellee:
MEDTRONIC SOFAMOR DANEK DEGGENDORF GMBH, MEDTRONIC SOFAMOR DANEK USA, INC., WARSAW ORTHOPEDIC, INC. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THE DAN ABRAMS COMPANY LLC, Relator
State of Washington, et al v. USDHS, et al
as 19-35914
Plaintiff / Appellee:
STATE OF COLORADO, STATE OF MINNESOTA, STATE OF MARYLAND and others
Defendant / Appellant:
KENNETH T. CUCCINELLI, in his official capacity as Acting Director of United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, a federal agency, UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, a federal agency and others
Amicus Curiae:
IMMIGRANT AND HEALTHCARE SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS and IMMIGRATION REFORM LAW INSTITUTE
Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection et al v. Consumer Advocacy Center Inc. et al
as 8:2019cv01998
Defendant:
Tuong Nguyen, Albert Kim, Kaine Wen and others
Receiver:
Thomas W McNamara
Plaintiff:
State of North Carolina, State of Minnesota, The People of the State of California and others
Petitioner:
Edu Doc Support, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Federal Trade Commision et al v. Manhattan Beach Venture, LLC et al
as 2:2019cv07849
Defendant:
Manhattan Beach Venture, LLC, Christopher E. Lyell, Equitable Acceptance Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
State of Minnesota and Federal Trade Commision
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5
The Dan Abrams Company LLC, et al v. Medtronic Inc., et al
as 19-55995
Plaintiff:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, STATE OF NEVADA, STATE OF FLORIDA and others
Defendant / Appellee:
MEDTRONIC SOFAMOR DANEK DEGGENDORF GMBH, MEDTRONIC SOFAMOR DANEK USA, INC., WARSAW ORTHOPEDIC, INC. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THE DAN ABRAMS COMPANY LLC, Relator
State of California et al v. Kevin K. McAleenan
as 2:2019cv07390
Plaintiff:
District of Columbia, State of Minnesota, Commonwealth of Virginia and others
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Alex M. Azar, II, U.S. Department of Homeland Security and others
Amicus Curiae:
Save the Children Federation, Inc., American Medical Association, First Focus on Children and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
