Cases 41 - 50 of 12,037
White v. Guardian Life Insurance Company, et al.
as 24-2681
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM WHITE
Defendant:
GUARDIAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, THE STAFFING RESOURCE GROUP, INC. GROUP ACCIDENTAL DEATH & DISMEMBERMENT PLAN and DOES 1-10
Klobus v. Akero Therapeutics, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv02534
Plaintiff:
Dora Klobus
Defendant:
Akero Therapeutics, Inc., Andrew Cheng, William White and others
John Doe v. Priscilla A. Madrid et al
as 8:2024cv00909
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
Priscilla A. Madrid, Thomas Vasquez, William Earl Baker, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Schuman, et al. v. Microchip Technology Incorporated, et al.
as 24-2624
Plaintiff:
PETER SCHUMAN and WILLIAM COPLIN
Defendant:
MICROCHIP TECHNOLOGY INCORPORATED, ATMEL CORPORATION and ATMEL CORPORATION UNITED STATES SEVERANCE GUARANTEE BENEFIT PROGRAM
Welch v. Gittere, et al.
as 24-2635
Plaintiff:
KENTRELL D WELCH
Defendant:
Warden WILLIAM GITTERE, WILLIAM RUEBART, DAVID DRUMMOND and others
Mahmoud v. Williams, et al.
as 24-2623
Petitioner:
MOHAMED ABDALLA MAHMOUD
Respondent:
BRIAN WILLIAMS and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Slack v. Jinkens, et al.
as 24-2592
Plaintiff:
TOMMIE SLACK
Defendant:
W. JINKENS, Chaplain at Benton County Correction, JENNIFER LNU, Chaplain at Benton County Correction, COMBS, Lieutenant at Benton County Correction and others
v. Williams-Sonoma, Inc.
as 3:2024cv02395
Defendant:
Williams-Sonoma, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045 Federal Trade Commission Act
United States of America v. Williams-Sonoma, Inc.
as 3:2024cv02396
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Williams-Sonoma, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045 Federal Trade Commission Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv05042
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
