Cases 51 - 60 of 122
City of Culver City v. USDOT, et al
as 16-73474
Petitioner:
CITY OF CULVER CITY, a chartered municipal corporation
Respondent:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, ANTHONY FOXX, Secretary of Transportation, FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION and others
City of Newport Beach v. FAA, et al
as 16-73458
Petitioner:
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
Respondent:
FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION, MICHAEL P. HUERTA, in his official capacity as Administrator, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION and others
Rojas v. Federal Aviation Administration et al
as 2:2016cv03067
Plaintiff:
Jorge Alejandro Rojas
Defendant:
Federal Aviation Administration and United States Department of Transportation
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
The City of Santa Monica v. FAA
as 16-72827
Petitioner:
CITY OF SANTA MONICA
Respondent:
FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION
Rojas v. Federal Aviation Administration
as 2:2015cv01985
Plaintiff:
Jorge Alejandro Rojas
Defendant:
Federal Aviation Administration
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Rojas v. Federal Aviation Administration
as 2:2015cv01709
Plaintiff:
Jorge Alejandro Rojas
Defendant:
Federal Aviation Administration
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Jorge Alejandro Rojas v. Federal Aviation Administration
as 2:2015cv05811
Plaintiff:
Jorge Alejandro Rojas
Defendant:
Federal Aviation Administration
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Jorge Alejandro Rojas v. Federal Aviation Administration
as 2:2015cv05444
Defendant:
Federal Aviation Administration
Plaintiff:
Jorge Alejandro Rojas
Paul Connors v. NTSB, et al
as 15-70333
Petitioner:
PAUL CONNORS
Respondent:
NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD and MICHAEL P. HUERTA, Administrator, Federal Aviation Administration
James Lyons, et al v. FAA, et al
as 14-72991
Petitioner:
JAMES E. LYONS, TINA NGUYEN, MARY JANE MCCARTHY and others
Respondent:
FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION and MICHAEL P. HUERTA, Administrator
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
