Cases 51 - 60 of 93
West v. AT&T Mobility, LLC et al
as 3:2014cv00350
Plaintiff:
Kathryn E. West
Defendant:
AT&T Mobility, LLC, EOS CCA, Diversified Consultants, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Childers v. Receivables Performance Management LLC et al
as 2:2013cv00697
Plaintiff:
Frederick Childers
Defendant:
Receivables Performance Management LLC
Garnishee:
Sterling Savings Bank
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000 Cause Code Unknown
Hall v. Receivables Performance Management, LLC
as 3:2013cv00805
Plaintiff:
Joshua Hall
Defendant:
Receivables Performance Management, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Jendrysik v. Receivables Performance Management, LLC
as 2:2013cv00559
Plaintiff:
Wendy Jendrysik
Defendant:
Receivables Performance Management, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Childers v. Receivables Performance Management LLC et al
as 2:2013mc00046
Plaintiff:
Frederick Childers
Defendant:
Receivables Performance Management LLC
Garnishee:
Sterling Savings Bank
Meyer v. Receivables Performance Management, LLC
as 2:2012cv02013
Plaintiff:
Devon Meyer
Defendant:
Receivables Performance Management, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227 Telephone Consumer Protection Act
Randy Dake v. Receivables Performance Management LLC et al
as 5:2012cv01680
Plaintiff:
Randy Dake
Defendant:
Does and Receivables Performance Management LLC
Childers v. Receivables Performance Management LLC
as 2:2012mc00169
Plaintiff:
Frederick Childers
Defendant:
Receivables Performance Management LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv06292
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Taylor v. Receivables Performance Management, LLC
as 2:2012cv00842
Defendant:
Receivables Performance Management, LLC
Plaintiff:
Patty Taylor
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
