Cases 61 - 66 of 66
Marshall Home v. Quinton Mehr, et al
as 08-16916
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARSHALL EDWIN HOME
Defendant - Appellee:
QUINTON MEHR, Arizona Department of Public Safety, GREG, ADOT MVD Division, HARRY, ADOT MVD Division and others
Hamabe et al v Teton Springs Golf & Casting Club, et al
as 4:2008cv00288
Plaintiff:
Chris Hamabe, Chris Hamabe, Chris Hamabe and others
Defendant:
Teton Springs Golf & Casting Club, LLC, Jon Pinardi, Anthony Vest and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Home v. Mehr et al
as 4:2008cv00222
Plaintiff:
Marshall E Home
Defendant:
Quentin Mehr, Greg, Harry and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2008cv00099
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Martina L Walker et al v. Keith Stanton et al
as 5:2008cv00024
Plaintiff:
Martina L Walker, Kevin Crawford, Sneakers and others
Defendant:
Keith Stanton, Archie Joe Biggers, Nicole Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Racketeering (RICO) Act
USA, et al v. Montrose Chemical, et al
as 2:1990cv03122
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Simpson Paper Company, Potlatch Corporation, Montrose Chemical Corporation of California and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
Anaheim City of, Garden Grove Sanitary District, San Fernando City of and others
Defendant:
County Sanitation District No. 2 of Los Angeles County, County Sanitation District of Los Angeles, Rhone Poulenc Inc and others
Counter Defendant:
Dept of Interior, Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board, State of California Air Resources Board and others
Cross Defendant:
Does 1 through 40,000, being a class of persons & entities similarly situated
Plaintiff:
United States of America and California State Of
Intervenor:
Travelers Indemnity Co
Special Master:
John Francis Carroll
Amicus Curiae:
Council of American Survey Research Organizations Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
