Cases 71 - 80 of 807
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00948
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Ramos Mendez v. Garland
as 22-1018
Petitioner:
DOMINGO RAMOS MENDEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Bahar Mikhak v. USDC-CASF
as 22-70104
Not Classified By Court:
In re: BAHAR MIKHAK, UNIVERSITY OF PHOENIX, INC., an Arizona corporation, WILLIAM J. PEPICELLO, President and others
Petitioner:
BAHAR MIKHAK
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO
Ramos-Aguirre v. Garland
as 22-775
Petitioner:
SANTOS RAMOS-AGUIRRE and VANESSA CAROLINA RAMOS-RAMOS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Jerome Daroya v. Mary Josephine Daroya-Lushina et al
as 2:2022cv02695
Plaintiff:
Jerome Daroya, JLDAroya Associates and Aroyad Ventures Group LLC a California Limited Liability Company doing business as JMDAroya Associates
Defendant:
Mary Josephine Daroya-Lushina and Dominick Ramos
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Velasquez Ramos v. Garland
as 22-718
Petitioner:
CRISTINA VELASQUEZ RAMOS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
United States of America v. Mireya Ramos
as 5:2022cv00636
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Mireya Ramos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 3205 Garnishment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00460
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Raymond Ramos v. Nabors Completion and Production Services Co. et al
as 2:2022cv01632
Petitioner:
Raymond Ramos
Respondent:
Nabors Completion and Production Services Co.
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0009 Petition to Confirm Arbitration Award
Ramos Quevedo v. Garland
as 22-389
Petitioner:
JUVENAL RAMOS QUEVEDO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
