Cases 1 - 10 of 322
Deng v. Henry, et al.
as 24-1960
Plaintiff:
TONY DENG
Defendant:
UNKNOWN HENRY, Deputy Warden, Cook Unit, ROCKY SUTTON, CO IV, UNKNOWN BARNES, Officer and others
United States of America v. Barnes
as 24-1613
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
KEVIN ANDRE BARNES
Flannery Assoc. LLC v. Barnes Family Ranch Assoc., LLC et al
as 2:2023cv00927
Plaintiff:
Flannery Associates LLC
Defendant:
Barnes Family Ranch Associates, LLC, Lambie Ranch Associates, LLC, Kirby Hill Associates, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Richard J Koppel v. Robert Bonta et al
as 8:2023cv00813
Plaintiff:
Richard J. Koppel
Defendant:
Robert Bonta, Don Barnes and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Antoine Barnes v. Ninth Circuit Judges
as 23-70066
Petitioner:
ANTOINE DESHAWN BARNES
Respondent:
NINTH CIRCUIT JUDGES
United States of America v. Barnes
as 23-647
Defendant / Appellant:
RENEA BARNES and Renea Valdez
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States Of America v. Stratics Networks Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00313
Plaintiff:
United States Of America
Defendant:
Stratics Networks Inc., Netlatitude, Inc., Kurt Hannigan and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0252 Telecommunications Act
Morgan et al v. RealPage Inc et al
as 2:2022cv01712
Plaintiff:
Lauren Ashley Morgan, Erik Barnes, Sherry Bason and others
Defendant:
RealPage, Inc., Greystar Real Estate Partners, LLC, Lincoln Property Co. and others
Interested Party:
Gabriel Navarro and Laura Boelens
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Zachary Corradino, Samantha Reyes, Patrick Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Lauren Ashley Morgan et al v. The Irvine Company, LLC et al
as 8:2022cv02136
Plaintiff:
Erik Barnes and Lauren Ashley Morgan
Defendant:
The Irvine Company, LLC, RealPage, Inc., Greystar Real Estate Partners, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0001 Antitrust Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
