Cases 1 - 10 of 57
Doe v. Sequoia Capital et al
as 9:2023cv00088
Plaintiff:
Amber Baptiste
Defendant:
Sequoia Capital, Michael Lewis Goguen, Two Bear Capital and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Providence St. Joseph Health et al v. Actavis Holdco US, Inc. et al
as 5:2023cv03298
Plaintiff:
Astera Health, Providence St. Joseph Health, UPMC and others
Defendant:
Actavis Holdco US, Inc., Actavis Pharma, Inc., Actavis Elizabeth LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00533
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv02068
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
(PS) Selck v. Mikuni Restaurants et al
as 2:2022cv02141
Plaintiff:
Morrey Selck
Defendant:
Mikuni Restaurants, California Bank & Trust, First Japanese Baptist Church and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Stevanus Edward v. Former President Trump et al
as 5:2022cv01066
Plaintiff:
Stevanus Edward
Defendant:
Former President Trump, Trump Administration, Former Prsident Obama and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Baptiste v. Garland
as 22-975
Petitioner:
EDUNERT BAPTISTE
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Kenneth Baptiste v. B. Martinez, et al
as 21-16357
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENNETH EMANUEL BAPTISTE
Defendant / Appellee:
B. MARTINEZ, Correctional Counselor II, M. WYNN, Senior Staff Psychologist, J. HOWLIN, Chief of Mental Health and others
Defendant:
J. LEWIS, Deputy Director of Policy and Risk Management, of CDC Healthcare Services and S. HATTON, Warden
Clarence Johnson, Jr. v. CDC, et al
as 21-35653
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CLARENCE D. JOHNSON, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
CDC, COVID 19, Crimes, HENRICO, VA Sheriff and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
