Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Cascadia Wildlands, et al v. Jim Thrailkill, et al
as 14-35819
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CASCADIA WILDLANDS, OREGON WILD and CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY
Defendant - Appellee:
JIM THRAILKILL and UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellee:
BOISE CASCADE WOOD PRODUCTS, LLC, ROUGH & READY LUMBER, LLC and SWANSON GROUP MFG. LLC
Cascadia Wildlands et al v. Thrailkill et al
as 6:2014cv01236
Intervenor Defendant:
Boise Cascade Wood Products LLC, Rough & Ready Lumber LLC and Swanson Group Mfg. LLC
Plaintiff:
Cascadia Wildlands, Center For Biological Diversity, OR and Oregon Wild
Defendant:
Jim Thrailkill and United States Fish and Wildlife Service
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
League of Wilderness Defenders, et al v. Kent Connaughton, et al
as 13-35653
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LEAGUE OF WILDERNESS DEFENDERS/BLUE MOUNTAINS BIODIVERSITY PROJECT, an Oregon nonprofit corporation and HELLS CANYON PRESERVATION COUNCIL, an Oregon nonprofit corporation
Defendant - Appellee:
KENT CONNAUGHTON, Regional Forester, Pacific Northwest Region of the Forest Service, in his official capacity, UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, an agency of the United States Department of Agriculture, U.S. FISH & WILDLIFE SERVICE, an agency of the United States Department of the Interior and others
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellee:
BAKER COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Oregon, UNION COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Oregon, BOISE CASCADE WOOD PRODUCTS, a Delaware limited liability company and others
Georgia-Pacific LLC v. OfficeMax Incorporated et al
as 4:2012cv02797
Plaintiff:
Georgia-Pacific LLC
Defendant:
OfficeMax Incorporated and Boise Cascade, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9601
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00858
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
