Cases 1 - 10 of 132
Brittany Edwards v. TikTok, Inc.
as 5:2024cv02039
Respondent:
TIKTOK, INC.
Petitioner:
BRITTANY EDWARDS, on behalf of D.B. BARLOW
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0001 U.S. Arbitration Act
Hess v. Centurion Health, et al.
as 24-5765
Defendant:
CENTURION HEALTH, Named as Centurion Healthcare Vender ADOCRR, BREA LAWSEN, Nurse, Agent of Centurion, RYAN THORNELL, DIRECTOR OF THE ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, REHABILITATION and others
Plaintiff:
GREG HESS
MacDonald v. Oregon Health And Science University, et al.
as 24-4852
Defendant:
SUE STEWARD, An Individual, JAMES A. CARLSON, An Individual, STEVE ZIKA, An Individual and others
Plaintiff:
BRITTANY K. MACDONALD
Pravati Capital LLC et al v. Moore et al
as 2:2024mc00023
Defendant:
Mia Lytell, Amy Moore, Emma Hopper and others
Plaintiff:
Pravati Investment Fund III LP, Pravati Investment Fund IV LP and Pravati Capital LLC
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01733
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Morrison v. Yippee Entertainment, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00797
Plaintiff:
Brittany Morrison
Defendant:
YIPPEE ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
Keeton v. Powerschool Group LLC
as 2:2024cv01174
Plaintiff:
Brittany Keeton
Defendant:
Powerschool Group LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Gutierrez-Montoya, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2378
Petitioner:
ISIS DAMARY GUTIERREZ-MONTOYA, BRITTANY YICEL ZUNIGA-GUTIERREZ and ANTHONY STEVEN ZUNIGA-GUTIERREZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Ronk v. Hudson, et al.
as 24-145
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHELE RONK
Defendant / Appellee:
KATHERYN ELIZABETH HUDSON, p/k/a Katy Perry, BRITTANY HAZZARD, p/k/a Starrah, FERRAS ALQAISI and others
Winder v. Loanme, LLC
as 3:2024cv00025
Plaintiff:
Brittany Winder
Defendant:
Loanme, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
