Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Lunch Inc v. Diligence Corporation et al
as 2:2023cv08414
Defendant:
Keshanti E Chism, Carrie Anne Parrish, Diligence Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Lunch Inc
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Maricela Valdez Chism v. Award Metals Inc.
as 2:2023cv04952
Plaintiff:
Maricela Valdez Chism
Defendant:
Award Metals, Inc. a/k/a Pacific Award Metals, Inc., Award Metals Inc. and Pacific Award Metals Inc.
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365 Environmental Matters
Joe Carlini v. Paramount Pictures Corporation, et al
as 21-55213
Defendant / Appellee:
PETER HYUCK, an individual, WILL PACKER PRODUCTIONS, INC., a California corporation, JAMES LOPEZ, an individual and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOE GREGORY CARLINI, an individual
Chism v. Lone Butte Development LLC
as 2:2020cv01793
Defendant:
Lone Butte Development LLC
Plaintiff:
Freddie Chism
Cause Of Action: 38 U.S.C. § 4323
The Bank of New York Mellon et al v. Ronnie Chism
as 2:2017cv04308
Defendant:
Ronnie Chism and Does
Plaintiff:
The Bank of New York Mellon
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00152
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Chism v. Credit One Bank, N.A.
as 3:2016cv00672
Plaintiff:
Derek Chism
Defendant:
Credit One Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Mehmood v. Delaney et al
as 2:2015cv01818
Defendant:
11 Board of Governors, USPS, 12 Board Members, CCA, Administrative Office of the United States Courts and others
Plaintiff:
Yasir Mehmood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
William Chism, III v. California Supreme Court
as 13-71923
:
In re: WILLIAM H. CHISM, III
Petitioner:
WILLIAM H. CHISM, III
Respondent:
CALIFORNIA SUPREME COURT
Real Party In Interest:
RON DAVIS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv02580
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
