Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Curley Broussard, Jr. v. USA
as 21-71066
Petitioner:
CURLEY JOHN BROUSSARD, Jr.
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Barth v. Mabry Carlton Ranch, Inc et al
as 5:2020cv09288
Defendant:
Longino Ranch, Inc., Mabry Carlton Ranch, Inc, Eric Sutton and others
Plaintiff:
John S Barth and John Barth
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Curley Broussard, Jr. v. Tammy Foss
as 20-70684
Petitioner:
CURLEY JOHN BROUSSARD, Jr.
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and TAMMY FOSS
Curley Broussard, Jr. v. Tammy Foss
as 19-70102
Petitioner:
CURLEY JOHN BROUSSARD, Jr.
Respondent:
TAMMY FOSS, Acting Warden
United Financial Casualty Company v. Camreon Boucher et al
as 5:2018cv00395
Defendant:
Cameron Boucher, Julie Boucher, California Casualty Indemnity Exchange and others
Plaintiff:
United Financial Casualty Company
Cornelia of the House of Altura v. Opiana et al
as 1:2014mc00251
Plaintiff:
Cornelia of the House of Altura
Defendant:
Edward Opiana and Christopher Curley
AFCM Incorporated et al v. Elite Global Farming and Logistics Incorporated et al
as 2:2014mc00016
Plaintiff:
AFCM Incorporated and FO-Farmer's Outlet Incorporated
Defendant:
Elite Global Farming and Logistics Incorporated, Jose Escamilla, John Creighton and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Curley Broussard, Jr. v. USDC-CAFR
as 13-73933
:
In re: CURLEY JOHN BROUSSARD, Jr.
Petitioner:
CURLEY JOHN BROUSSARD, Jr.
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, FRESNO
Real Party In Interest:
MATTHEW CATE
Curley Broussard, Jr. v. Ralph Diaz
as 13-73761
Petitioner:
CURLEY JOHN BROUSSARD, Jr.
Respondent:
RALPH M. DIAZ
Fressadi et al v. Powell et al
as 4:2012cv00876
Plaintiff:
Arek Fressadi and Unknown Parties
Defendant:
Jay Powell, BMO Financial Group, Unknown Parties and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
