Other Statutes Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 96
Nationstar Mortgage LLC v. Patrick Joseph Soria et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv03041
Defendant: George Wesley Pierce, Jr., Rebekah Brown, Westwood Legal and others
Plaintiff: Nationstar Mortgage LLC and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee for The Holders of the First Franklin Mortgage Loan Trust 2006-FF10 Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2006-FF10
Receiver: Robb Evans & Associates LLC, Temporary Receiver and Robb Evans and Associates LLC
Interested Party: Robert West, Morgan Picks Two LLC, Deutsche Bank National Trust Company as Trustee Formerly Known as Bankers Trust Company of California, N.A., Not in its Individual Capacity but Solely as Trustee, or its Permitted Successors and Assig and others
Intervenor Plaintiff: Marina Ivanoff
Intervenor: Selene Finance, Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing, Select Portfolio Services, LLC and others
Intervenor Defendant: All Persons Unknown Claiming any Legal or Equitable Right, Title, Estate, Lien or Interest in The Subject Property Located at 390 South Sepulveda Boulevard Unit 208, Los Angeles, California 90049, APN, Kimberly L Yamada-Tung, Christina Gifford and others
Petitioner: Garson Silvers, DNE Associates, a CA general partnership, The Bank of New York Mellon fka The Bank of New York as Trustee for the Certificateholders CWMBS, Inc CHL Mortgage Pass-Through Trust 2005-HYB4, Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2005-HYB4 and others
3Rd Party Defendant: Century 21 Citrus Realty and Albert Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
James Barrow, et al v. NewRez LLC, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-15626
Defendant / Appellee: NEWREZ LLC, DBA Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing, NEW RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE LLC, MORTGAGE LAW FIRM PC, an Arizona Corporation and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: JAMES BARROW and GEORGE A TACKER
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv01051
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Kristine Bistline v. Ditech Financial LLC, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-56323
Plaintiff / Appellant: KRISTINE ANN BISTLINE
Defendant / Appellee: DOES, 1-30, DITECH FINANCIAL LLC, doing business in the state of California, FKA Green Tree Servicing LLC and FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION
Ditech Financial LLC v. Park Bonanza
as 20-16575
Plaintiff / Appellant: DITECH FINANCIAL LLC
Defendant / Appellee: PARK BONANZA EAST TOWNHOUSE OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC.
Ditech Financial LLC v. Hampton & Hampton Collections, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-16357
Defendant: VISTA GRANDE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION and HAMPTON & HAMPTON COLLECTIONS, LLC
Plaintiff: DITECH FINANCIAL LLC
Counter Claimant: SATICOY BAY SERIES LLC 256 CAMINO VIEJO
Ditech Financial LLC, et al v. KK Real Estate Investment Fund
as 20-16279
Plaintiff / Appellee: DITECH FINANCIAL LLC and FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION
Defendant / Appellant: KK REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT FUND, LLC
FHFA, et al v. Thunder Properties, Inc.
as 20-15919
Plaintiff / Appellee: BAYVIEW LOAN SERVICING, LLC, FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION, NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC and others
Defendant / Appellant: THUNDER PROPERTIES, INC.
Ditech Financial LLC v. T-Shack, Inc., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-15827
Plaintiff / Appellee: DITECH FINANCIAL LLC
Defendant / Appellant: T-SHACK, INC.
Defendant: WESTTROP ASSOCIATION
Ditech Financial LLC v. SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-15498
Plaintiff: DITECH FINANCIAL LLC
Defendant: SPRING MOUNTAIN RANCH HOA
Cross Defendant: MICHELLE BOWSER and JERRY BOWSER
Counter Claimant: SFR INVESTMENTS POOL 1, LLC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?