Cases 1 - 10 of 329
Rodriguez Dominguez, et al. v. Garland
as 24-3113
Petitioner:
MARICELA ELIZABETH RODRIGUEZ DOMINGUEZ, KIMBERLY MICHELLE MORAN RODRIGUEZ and CHRISS ENRIQUE MORAN RODRIGUEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Dominguez v. Garland
as 24-3121
Petitioner:
ROSA AMALIA DOMINGUEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Albarran Iturbe, et al. v. Garland
as 24-3028
Petitioner:
CLARISA ALBARRAN ITURBE, ERIK ALEJANDRO DOMINGUEZ and ERIC ISAI DOMINGUEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
United States of America v. Dominguez
as 24-2936
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
STEVE LEE DOMINGUEZ
Dominguez v. Lowe's Companies Incorporated et al
as 2:2024cv01030
Plaintiff:
Martin Dominguez
Defendant:
Lowe's Companies Incorporated and Salesforce Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Padilla Cantillano, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1918
Petitioner:
HENRY ALEXANDER PADILLA CANTILLANO, I, REINA LETICIA INTERIANO DOMINGUEZ, KEVIN ALEXANDER PADILLA INTERIANO and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Delgado, et al. v. ILWU-PMA Welfare Plan
as 24-1845
Plaintiff:
ANGELINA BOWEN DELGADO, ROBIN BECERRA, STEVE BOZAN and others
Defendant:
ILWU-PMA WELFARE PLAN, an employee health and welfare plan under he Employee Retirement Income Security Act
Hernandez-Dominguez v. Garland
as 24-902
Petitioner:
JERBER ANIBAL HERNANDEZ-DOMINGUEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Bakhtiari et al v. Comerica Bank, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00273
Plaintiff:
Hamid R. Bakhtiari and Parichehr Etemadi
Defendant:
Comerica Bank, Inc., Int Sports Mgmt. Vidante World Resort, Louis Dominguez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv10724
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
