Other Statutes Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 211
Harper v. Amur Equipment Finance, Inc, et al.
as 24-2413
Plaintiff: JOHN HARPER
Defendant: AMUR EQUIPMENT FINANCE, INC, WATSON & CHELIN MANUFACTERING, INC and ARTISAN AND TRUCKERS CASUALTY COMPANY
Munoz v. RDO Equipment Company
as 24-2356
Plaintiff: SIMON MUNOZ, on behalf of himself, all others similarly situated, and on behalf of the general public
Defendant: RDO EQUIPMENT COMPANY
Andrikos, et al. v. Pacific Maritime Association, et al.
as 24-1554
Plaintiff: EVAGELOS ANDRIKOS, BRYANT BURNS, MICHAEL OLVERA and others
Appellant: ANTHONY WHEELER
Defendant: PACIFIC MARITIME ASSOCIATION, APM TERMINALS PACIFIC LLC, APS STEVEDORING, LLC and others
FGI Industries Inc v. Tangshan Ayers Bath Equipment Co. Ltd
as 24-1494
Plaintiff: FGI INDUSTRIES INC
Defendant: TANGSHAN AYERS BATH EQUIPMENT CO. LTD
G and C Equipment Corporation et al v. Sankofa Company et al
as 2:2023cv09706
Plaintiff: G&C Equipment Corporation, Gence Corporation and G & C Service and Supply Corp.
Defendant: Sankofa Company and Terrence L. Watkins
Twin Harbors Waterkeeper v. Rognlin's Inc
as 3:2023cv05798
Plaintiff: Twin Harbors Waterkeeper
Defendant: Rognlin's Inc. (Equipment Shop) and Rognlin's Inc
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1319 Clean Water Act
Pons et al v. Walter Kidde Portable Equipment Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv03436
Plaintiff: Stephen Pons, Caroline Coleman and Stanley Wolken
Defendant: Walter Kidde Portable Equipment Inc., BRK Brands, Inc., Walter Kidde Portable Equipment Inc. doing business as Kidde Safety Equipment and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Coyote Valley Band of Pomo Indians v. Robert Findleton, et al
as 23-15155
Plaintiff / Appellant: COYOTE VALLEY BAND OF POMO INDIANS, a federally recognized Indian tribe
Defendant / Appellee: ROBERT FINDLETON, DBA Terre Construction and On-Site Equipment, ANN C. MOORMAN, Judge of the Superior Court of Mendocino County, California, in her official capacity and SAVINGS BANK OF MENDOCINO COUNTY
In Re Ex Parte Application of Align Technology, Inc. and Align Sichuan Medical Equipment Co., Ltd. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022mc00236
In Re: Ex Parte Application of Align Technology, Inc. and Align Sichuan Medical Equipment Co., Ltd. for an Order Pursuant to 28 USC 1782 and Ex Parte Application of Align Technology, Inc. and Align Sichuan Medical Equipment Co., Ltd.
Petitioner: Align Technology, Inc. and Align Sichuan Medical Equipment Co., Ltd.
Respondent: B. Chia Soo
In re Ex Parte Application of Align Technology, Inc and Align (Sichuan) Medical Equipment Co. Ltd. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022mc80315
Plaintiff: Align Technology, Inc and Align (Sichuan) Medical Equipment Co., LTD
Interested Party: The Regents of the University of California

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?