Cases 1 - 10 of 63
Center for Biological Diversity, et al. v. United States Bureau of Land Management, et al.
as 23-3624
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, FRIENDS OF THE EARTH, GREENPEACE, INC. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, UNITED STATES FISH & WILDLIFE SERVICE, NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
CONOCOPHILLIPS ALASKA, INC., ARCTIC SLOPE REGIONAL CORPORATION, NORTH SLOPE BOROUGH and others
Resolute Forest Products, Inc., et al v. Greenpeace International, et al
as 23-15922
Plaintiff / Appellee:
RESOLUTE FOREST PRODUCTS, INC., RESOLUTE FP US, INC., RESOLUTE FP AUGUSTA, LLC and others
Defendant / Appellant:
GREENPEACE INTERNATIONAL, AKA Greenpeace Stichting Council, GREENPEACE, INC., AMY MOAS and others
Resolute Forest Products, Inc., et al v. Greenpeace International, et al
as 23-15782
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RESOLUTE FOREST PRODUCTS, INC., RESOLUTE FP US, INC., RESOLUTE FP AUGUSTA, LLC and others
Defendant / Appellee:
GREENPEACE INTERNATIONAL, AKA Greenpeace Stichting Council, GREENPEACE, INC., AMY MOAS and others
Center for Biological Diversity, et al v. BLM, et al
as 23-35227
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE, FRIENDS OF THE EARTH and others
Defendant / Appellee:
BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
CONOCOPHILLIPS ALASKA, INC., ARCTIC SLOPE REGIONAL CORPORATION, NORTH SLOPE BOROUGH and others
Amicus Curiae:
LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF ALASKA, LISA MURKOWSKI, United States Senator, MARY SATTLER PELTOLA, United States Representative and others
Center for Biological Diversity et al v. Bureau of Land Management et al
as 3:2023cv00061
Plaintiff:
Center for Biological Diversity, Defenders of Wildlife, Friends of the Earth and others
Defendant:
Bureau of Land Management, United States Fish and Wildlife Service, National Marine Fisheries Service and others
Petitioner:
ConocoPhillips Alaska, Inc. and Arctic Slope Regional Corporation
Intervenor Defendant:
North Slope Borough, Kuukpik Corporation and State of Alaska
Amicus Curiae:
Lisa Murkowski, Dan Sullivan, Mary Sattler Peltola and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Maritime Subsidy Board
Sierra Club et al v. Bureau of Land Management et al
as 3:2022cv00189
Plaintiff:
Sierra Club, Friends of the Earth and Greenpeace, Inc.
Defendant:
Bureau of Land Management, United States Department of the Interior, Deb Haaland and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Maritime Subsidy Board
Center for Bio. Diversity, et al v. BLM, et al
as 21-35095
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
CONOCOPHILLIPS ALASKA, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, CHAD PADGETT, in his official capacity as State Director for the Bureau of Land Management Alaska and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, GREENPEACE, INC. and FRIENDS OF THE EARTH
Amicus Curiae:
ARCTIC SLOPE REGIONAL CORPORATION, NORTH SLOPE BOROUGH and STATE OF ALASKA
Greenpeace, Inc. v. Walmart, Inc.
as 3:2021cv00754
Plaintiff:
Greenpeace, Inc.
Defendant:
WALMART INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Organized Village of Kake et al v. Perdue et al
as 1:2020cv00011
Plaintiff:
The Boat Company, National Audubon Society, The Wilderness Society and others
Defendant:
United States Forest Service, Sonny Perdue, United States Department of Agriculture and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
Center for Biological Diversity et al v. Bureau of Land Management et al
as 3:2020cv00308
Plaintiff:
Friends of the Earth, Greenpeace, Inc. and Center for Biological Diversity
Defendant:
Chad B. Padgett, Bureau of Land Management, David Bernhardt and others
Amicus Curiae:
State of Alaska and Arctic Slope Regional Corporation
Intervenor Defendant:
ConocoPhillips Alaska, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
