Cases 1 - 10 of 51
Sigari et al v. Banasik
as 5:2024cv01816
Plaintiff:
HANIEH SIGARI and QYRAL, LLC
Defendant:
DARIUSZ BANASIK, Shopify (USA) Inc., Google LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
The Football Association Premier League Limited v. GoDaddy.com, LLC
as 2:2024mc00052
Petitioner:
The Football Association Premier League Limited
Respondent:
GoDaddy.com, LLC
Whaleco Incorporated v. Domains by Proxy LLC et al
as 2:2023mc00029
Plaintiff:
Whaleco Incorporated
Defendant:
Domains by Proxy LLC, GoDaddy.com LLC and Unknown Parties
Bottom Line Concepts LLC v. GoDaddy.com
as 2:2023mc00007
Plaintiff:
Bottom Line Concepts LLC
Defendant:
GoDaddy.com
New World Times SA v. Asociacion Nacional de Futbol Profesional et al
as 2:2022cv02031
Plaintiff:
New World Times SA
Defendant:
Asociacion Nacional de Futbol Profesional and GoDaddy.com LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Hao v. GoDaddy.com LLC et al
as 2:2022cv01709
Plaintiff:
Yuming Hao
Defendant:
GoDaddy.com LLC and Go Daddy Operating Company LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
In Re DMCA 512 (h) Subpoena to Godaddy.com, LLC
as 2:2022mc00204
Petitioner:
Jaspreet Jas Mathur
In Re:
DMCA 512 (h) Subpoena to Godaddy.com, LLC
Respondent:
Godaddy.com, LLC
hiQ Labs Incorporated v. LinkedIn Corporation
as 2:2022mc00025
In Re:
GoDaddy.com LLC
Plaintiff:
hiQ Labs Incorporated
Defendant:
LinkedIn Corporation
Application of Kersia SAS and Hypred SAS
as 2:2022mc00024
In Re:
Application of Kersia SAS and Hypred SAS
Petitioner:
Kersia SAS and Hypred SAS
Respondent:
GoDaddy.com LLC
Patrick Hurley v. GoDaddy.com, LLC, et al
as 21-15426
Defendant:
GODADDY OPERATING COMPANY LLC, DOES, named as John or Jane Does 1-20, GODADDY INDIA LLC and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PATRICK JAY HURLEY
Defendant / Appellee:
GODADDY.COM, LLC, DESERT NEWCO LLC and MICROSOFT CORPORATION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
