Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Inez Tarver v. National Railroad Passenger Co, et al
as 19-55647
Defendant / Appellee:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION, DBA Amtrak, PAMELA KEYES, JORGE RODRIGUEZ and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
INEZ SUNTA TARVER
Abdul Mohamed, et al v. Uber Technologies, Inc.
as 18-16097
Appellant:
STEVEN SIDLER, DANIEL TURNER, HAROLD BROWER and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SHANNON WISE, RONALD GILLETTE, BRANDON FARMER and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 18-16097
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Objector - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Inez Sunta Tarver v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation
as 2:2017cv04381
Defendant:
Rudolph Haynes, Pamela Keyes, National Railroad Passenger Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Inez Sunta Tarver
Jorge Rodriguez Rea v. Jefferson Session
as 17-70229
Petitioner:
JORGE RODRIGUEZ REA
Respondent:
SALLY Q. YATES, Acting Attorney General
Service Employees International Union v. Sal Roselli et al
as 2:2016cv05219
Defendant:
John Borsos, Gail Buhler, Ralph Cornejo and others
Plaintiff:
Service Employees International Union
Service Employees International Union v. Sal Roselli et al
as 2:2016mc00017
Defendant:
John Borsos, Gail Buhler, Ralph Cornejo and others
Plaintiff:
Service Employees International Union
Jorge Aguila-Rodriguez v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 13-73052
Petitioner:
JORGE AGUILA-RODRIGUEZ, AKA Jorge Aguila, AKA Jorge Rodriguez Aguila
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Alberto Lliles-Miramontes v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 12-72921
Petitioner:
ALBERTO LLILES-MIRAMONTES, AKA Jorge Rodriguez Montazuma
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Jorge Avalos Rodriguez v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 12-72430
Petitioner:
JORGE MARTIN AVALOS RODRIGUEZ, AKA Jorge Martin Avalos, AKA Jorge Rodriguez Avalos
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
