Cases 1 - 10 of 727
Su v. Amazon.com Services LLC
as 24-3260
Petitioner:
JULIE A. SU, Acting Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor
Respondent:
AMAZON.COM SERVICES LLC
Familias Unidas Por La Justicia AFL-CIO v. United States Department of Labor et al
as 2:2024cv00637
Plaintiff:
Familias Unidas por La Justicia, AFL-CIO
Defendant:
United States Department of Labor and Julie A Su
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Tafari v. Rucker, et al.
as 24-2842
Plaintiff:
RAS HEZEKIAH TAFARI
Defendant:
YVETTE RUCKER, JULIE RANDALL, GARRY MOLER and others
Warren v. The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company, et al.
as 24-2849
Plaintiff:
ALLANNA WARREN
Defendant:
THE LINCOLN NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, CRAIG BEAZER, ELLEN COOPER and others
Armida De Castro Henriquez v. Myrna Castro O'Bara et al
as 2:2024cv03151
Plaintiff:
ARMIDA DE CASTRO HENRIQUEZ
Defendant:
MYRNA CASTRO O'BARA, JOHN O'BARA, 1013 INVESTMENTS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Benjamin Melendez et al v. Culture Cannabis Club et al
as 2:2024cv02926
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN MELENDEZ, RANJEET PANNU and BIKRAMJIT SINGH PANNU
Defendant:
CULTURE CANNABIS CLUB, SKYBOX HOLDINGS 81, MAMMOTH LEGEND CONSULTING, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Benjamin Melendez et al v. Culture Cannabis Club et al
as 8:2024cv00815
Defendant:
Anh Tran, Culture Cannabis Club, Skybox Holdings 81 and others
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Melendez, Ranjeet Pannu and Bikramjit Singh Pannu
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Whitman v. Cu, et al.
as 24-1877
Petitioner:
DARRELL L. WHITMAN, DR.
Respondent:
JULIE A. CU, Acting U.S. Secretary of Labor and HAMPTON Y. DELLINGER, Special Counsel, Office of the Special Counsel
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00095
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
