Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Watts v. Novak, et al.
as 24-3151
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL RAY WATTS
Defendant:
LOGAN NOVAK, STEVEN JOSEPHSON, Deputy, KELLAN FEYERHARM, Corporal and others
Swanson v. United States
as 6:2023cv00810
Plaintiff:
Michael Ray Swanson
Defendant:
United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Michael Swanson v. USA
as 21-35779
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL RAY SWANSON
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Michael Swanson v. Department of Veterans Affairs
as 21-35649
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL RAY SWANSON
Defendant / Appellee:
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, Secretary
USA v. Michael Kapp
as 21-10216
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MICHAEL RAY KAPP, AKA Michael Kapp
Michael Maxwell v. Renee Baker, et al
as 21-15911
Respondent / Appellee:
RENEE BAKER, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL RAY MAXWELL
Michael Fuqua v. Raak, et al
as 21-15492
Defendant / Appellee:
HALL, Sgt., THOMAS, Chaplain, COCA, CO III and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL RAY FUQUA, AKA Michael Fuqua
Swanson v. United States
as 3:2021cv00350
Defendant:
United States
Plaintiff:
Michael Ray Swanson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Swanson v. United States et al
as 3:2021cv00053
Defendant:
United States and Joe Biden
Plaintiff:
Michael Ray Swanson
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365
Michael Fuqua v. Charles Ryan, et al
as 20-17162
Defendant / Appellee:
STERNS, Sgt. at SMU #1, UNKNOWN PARTIES, ADOC Correctional Officers employed at ADOC - in their official and individual capacities, Central Office COIII, Central Office COIV, Central Office Deputy Warden, CO II Kitchen Security at SMU #1, CAMIT, Correctional Officer II at Special Management Unit #1 and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL RAY FUQUA, AKA Michael Fuqua
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
