Cases 1 - 10 of 1,249
Calderon-Lopez, et al. v. Office of the California Secretary of State, et al.
as 24-3808
Plaintiff:
RICARDO J. CALDERON-LOPEZ, STARLIGHT ENTERTAINMENT ENTERPRISES, INC and STARLIGHT MUSIC MANAGEMENT, INC.
Defendant:
OFFICE OF THE CALIFORNIA SECRETARY OF STATE and UNKNOWN PARTY, Unknown State of California Government Personnel, Servicing the State Agencies-Franchise Tax Board
In the Matter of the Transfer of Offenders Pursuant to 18 USC 4100 et seq
as 2:2024mc00057
Not Yet Classified:
In the Matter of the Transfer of Offenders Pursuant to 18 USC 4100 et seq
Interested Party:
Interested Party
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01486
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Mi Familia Vota, et al. v. Mayes, et al.
as 24-3559
Plaintiff:
MI FAMILIA VOTA, VOTO LATINO, LIVING UNITED FOR CHANGE IN ARIZONA and others
Defendant:
KRIS MAYES, ARIZONA ATTORNEY GENERAL and STATE OF ARIZONA
Tabi v. Stephenson, et al.
as 24-3596
Plaintiff:
FRANCOIS TABI
Defendant:
Deputy STEPHENSON, No. 9401 and UNKNOWN PARTIES, Several Unnamed Security Officers at the Walmart Supercenter
Crews v. Unknown Party
as 2:2024cv01342
Plaintiff:
Jason Crews
Defendant:
Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00864
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Emiabata, et al. v. Bank of New York Mellon, et al.
as 24-3424
Plaintiff:
PHILIP EMIABATA and SYLVIA EMIABATA
Defendant:
BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, also named as Bank of New York Trust Company, SPECIALIZED LOAN SERVICING, LLC, JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. and others
Cook v. County of Maricopa, et al.
as 24-3426
Plaintiff:
SEANTAIN COOK
Defendant:
COUNTY OF MARICOPA, CENTURION MEDICAL SERVICES, ITORO ELIJAH and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
