Cases 1 - 10 of 167
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04574
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Perkins v. Panorama Towers Condominium Unit Owners Association, Inc., et al.
as 24-3329
Plaintiff:
PRESTON D. PERKINS, JR.
Defendant:
PANORAMA TOWERS CONDOMINIUM UNIT OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., DENNIS KARIGER, LUCKY LACT, LLC and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03388
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Spears v. Perkins
as 24-2276
Petitioner:
MARCUS ISAIAH SPEARS
Respondent:
JEFFEREY PERKINS, Superintendent
Freeman v. Westlund, et al.
as 24-2147
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN FREEMAN
Defendant:
JANE WESTLUND, CARRIE MONTOYA, JOHN WELTY and others
Person v. Perkins
as 24-1781
Petitioner:
ANTHONY SHRONE PERSON and Jafaka Mano Matiya
Respondent:
JEFFEREY PERKINS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00226
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Perkins Jr. v. Panorama Towers Condo Unit Owners, Dennis Kariger et al
as 2:2023cv01690
Plaintiff:
Preston D. Perkins Jr. and Preston D. Perkins, Jr.
Defendant:
Panorama Towers Condo Unit Owners, Dennis Kariger, Lucky Lact LLC, Tony S. Cercy, Cleanmax, Inc., Craig Cox and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Perkins v. U.S. Department of Agriculture et al
as 3:2023cv08113
Plaintiff:
Silkie Perkins
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Thomas Vilsack, U.S. Forest Service and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Paul Denham v. USDC-CAFR
as 23-70052
Not Classified By Court:
In re: PAUL JOHN DENHAM, STUART SHERMAN, Warden, WILLIAM ELSZY and others
Petitioner:
PAUL JOHN DENHAM
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, FRESNO
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
