Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Tripati v. Carter, et al.
as 24-2191
Plaintiff:
ANANT KUMAR TRIPATI
Defendant:
PAUL EDWARD CARTER, ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL, UNKNOWN CARTER, MICHAEL EVAN GOTTFRIED and others
Paul Timberlake v. Kelly Santoro
as 21-16406
Petitioner / Appellant:
PAUL EDWARD TIMBERLAKE
Respondent / Appellee:
KELLY SANTORO, Acting Warden
Anant Tripati v. Corizon Incorporated, et al
as 20-15593
Defendant / Appellee:
AKUASI ARHIN, Dr., KARYN E. KLAUSNER, ADOC Attorney, STEVEN BELL, CO III and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANANT KUMAR TRIPATI
Anant Tripati v. USDC-AZP
as 20-70366
Not Classified By Court:
JOSEPH SCOTT CONLON, Corizon Lawyer, PHYLLIS RANEY, Corizon Employee - Florence, Tempe, MEGHAN QUEEN, Trinity employee Florence and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA, PHOENIX
Petitioner:
ANANT KUMAR TRIPATI
Paul Duran v. Matthew Cate
as 19-55304
Petitioner / Appellant:
PAUL EDWARD DURAN
Respondent / Appellee:
MATTHEW CATE, Sec. of Corr.
Morgan Stanley Smith Barney et al v. Stafford
as 1:2015cv00015
Petitioner:
Morgan Stanley Smith Barney and Morgan Stanley Smith Barney FA Notes Holdings
Respondent:
Paul Edward Stafford
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. ยง 9
USA v. Paul Parnell
as 14-30208
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
PAUL EDWARD PARNELL
USA v. Paul Bell
as 14-50162
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
PAUL EDWARD BELL, AKA Best Choice, AKA Paul Bell Edward, AKA J-Roc, AKA Jay the Truth, AKA Jay-Roc, AKA Jay Rich, AKA Rich Rollin, AKA Charles Bruce Watkins
United States of America v. Monk
as 1:2010mc00010
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Paul Edward Monk
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
United States of America v. Monk
as 1:2010mc00011
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Paul Edward Monk
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
