Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Skyline Advanced Technology Services v. Shafer
as 24-3240
Plaintiff:
SKYLINE ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY SERVICES
Defendant:
SABRINA SHAFER
Skyline Advanced Technology Services v. Shafer, et al.
as 24-1377
Plaintiff:
SKYLINE ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY SERVICES
Defendant:
SABRINA SHAFER and RICH WONDERS
Smith v. Town of Chino Valley, et al.
as 23-2142
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRET SMITH
Defendant / Appellee:
TOWN OF CHINO VALLEY, a municipal corporation, CHINO VALLEY POLICE DEPARTMENT, a municipal corporation incorporated in the State of Arizona, UNKNOWN BROWN, named as RO Brown (CV21), individaully and as husband and others
Jacqueline Tauscher v. Pamela Donison, et al
as 21-16441
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JACQUELINE M. TAUSCHER, Mother of Minor Children Z.H. and A.H.
Defendant / Appellee:
PAMELA DONISON, ELIZABETH FELDMAN, GERALD PORTER and others
Defendant:
BRIAN SKOW
Sabrina Shafer v. Skyline ATS, et al
as 21-16239
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SABRINA SHAFER
Defendant / Appellee:
SKYLINE ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY SERVICES, a California corporation
Defendant:
MICHAEL ZANOTTO, ROBERT BERNOSKY, RODNEY GUENTHER and others
US Acquisition, LLC v. Kaizen Aviation, LLC et al
as 8:2021mc00017
Defendant:
Anthony V. Publiese, III, Thaddeus John Pryor, Harold A. Shafer and others
Plaintiff:
US Acquisition, LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv01713
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00525
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00219
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Brown v. Papa Murphy's Holdings Incorporated et al
as 3:2019cv05514
Defendant:
Jean M Birch, John Shafer, Papa Murphy's Holdings Incorporated and others
Plaintiff:
Evan Brown
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
