Cases 1 - 10 of 499
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00515
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00502
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01686
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Fair Credit Reporting Act
Harper v. Amur Equipment Finance, Inc, et al.
as 24-2413
Plaintiff:
JOHN HARPER
Defendant:
AMUR EQUIPMENT FINANCE, INC, WATSON & CHELIN MANUFACTERING, INC and ARTISAN AND TRUCKERS CASUALTY COMPANY
Lawyers For Fair Reciprocal Admission v. United States of America, et al.
as 24-2213
Plaintiff:
LAWYERS FOR FAIR RECIPROCAL ADMISSION
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL, MARY H. MURGUIA, CHIEF CIRCUIT JUDGE and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00710
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporting Act
United States of America v. Watson
as 24-1865
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
TYLER JAY WATSON
Watson et al v. Mercedes-Benz USA LLC
as 2:2024cv00170
Plaintiff:
Nicole Watson and Edward Watson
Defendant:
Mercedes-Benz USA LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Peterson, et al. v. Snohomish Regional Fire and Rescue, et al.
as 24-1044
Plaintiff:
DAVID PETERSON, JAY STICKNEY, BEAU WATSON and others
Defendant:
SNOHOMISH REGIONAL FIRE AND RESCUE and KEVIN O'BRIEN, Chief
Watson v. Hornecker Cowling Hassen & Heysell, LLP
as 24-916
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER WATSON
Defendant:
HORNECKER COWLING HASSEN & HEYSELL, LLP, an Oregon Limited Liability Partnership
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
