Cases 31 - 40 of 40
Dennis Elton v. Rudy Arambula et al
as 5:2012cv00067
Defendant:
Rudy Arambula, Tim Arambula and Unknown tenants
Plaintiff:
Dennis John Elton
Thomas v. LaSalle Bank, N.A. et al
as 3:2011cv03009
Plaintiff:
Rudie Thomas
Defendant:
LaSalle Bank, N.A. and DOES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Dennis Elton v. Arambula et al
as 5:2011cv01715
Defendant:
Rudy Arambula, Tim Arambula, Unknown tenants and others
Plaintiff:
Dennis Elton
Rudy Ramirez v. Americas Servicing Company et al
as 2:2011cv04278
Defendant:
Americas Servicing Company, BNC Mortgage Inc, Cal-Western Reconveyance Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Rudy Ramirez
Rudy Zavala v. Golden Empire Mortgage, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv02876
Defendant:
Aurora Loan Services, LLC, Does, Golden Empire Mortgage, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Rudy Zavala
NOAH et al v. GMAC Wolesale Mortgage Corp et al
as 2:2010cv08592
Plaintiff:
Guillermo Bitanga, Nestor Constantino, Scott Dunlap and others
Defendant:
Does and GMAC Wolesale Mortgage Corp
Cyrus Cardan v. Housing Authority of the City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2009cv03497
Plaintiff:
Cyrus Cardan
Defendant:
Housing Authority of the City of Los Angeles, Rudy Monteil, Beatrice Trujillo and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Willoughby Development Corpora, et al v. Ravalli County
as 08-35517
Plaintiff:
WILLOUGHBY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, REBECKA Z. LORDS, BIG SKY DEVELOPMENT GROUP, LLC and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BASS LANE, LLC, MARK BARTEAUX and SCOTT SCHMEIDEKE
Defendant - Appellee:
RAVALLI COUNTY
Lords v. Ravalli County
as 9:2007cv00002
Plaintiff:
Rebecka Z. Lords, Rebecka Z. Lords, Bass Lane, LLC and others
Defendant:
Ravalli County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Skokomish Indian Tri, et al v. USA, et al
as 3:1999cv05606
Plaintiff:
Skokomish Indian Tribe , Denny S Hurtado , Gordon A James and others
Defendant:
Tacoma Public Utility, Tacoma City of , William Barker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
