Cases 41 - 50 of 53
Kuder v. Haas et al
as 2:2010cv00404
Plaintiff:
Glenn-Michael Kuder
Defendant:
Tammy Haas, Minton Home Town Properties, Inc., JP Morgan Chase and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 (a) Fed. Question: Real Property
Town & Country Bank v. Goddard et al
as 2:2009cv00686
Defendant:
Brian Goddard, Brian Goddard, Daniel K. Lak and others
Plaintiff:
Town & Country Bank and Town & Country Bank
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Genaro Cervantes et al v. Argent Mortgage Company LLC et al
as 5:2009cv00701
Plaintiff:
Genaro Cervantes and Laura Cervantes
Defendant:
Argent Mortgage Company LLC, Argent Mortgage Company LLC, Litton Loan Servicing LP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444 Notice of Removal - Foreclosure
Martha Tereza v. Agent Mortgage Company LLC et al
as 8:2009cv00364
Plaintiff:
Martha Tereza
Defendant:
Agent Mortgage Company LLC, Agent Mortgage Company LLC, CR Title Services Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444 Notice of Removal - Foreclosure
Transwestern Pipeline Company, v. 21.87 Acres of Property Locate, et al
as 08-15989
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TRANSWESTERN PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
Defendant - Appellee:
21.87 ACRES OF PROPERTY LOCATED IN MARICOPA COUNTY, MORE OR LESS, SUN VALLEY ASSEMBLAGE LLC, an Arizona limited liability company, TOWN OF BUCKEYE, a municipal corporation and others
Amicus Curiae:
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF HOME BUILDERS, HOME BUILDERS ASSOCIATION OF CENTRAL ARIZONA and INTERSTATE NATURAL GAS ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA
Transwestern Pipeline Company, v. 3.79 acres of permanent easeme, et al
as 08-15975
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TRANSWESTERN PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
Defendant - Appellee:
3.79 ACRES OF PERMANENT EASEMENT LOCATED IN MARICOPA COUNTY, MORE OR LESS, 4.38 ACRES OF TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT LOCATED IN MARICOPA COUNTY, MORE OR LESS, NUCLEAR VISION, LLC and others
Amicus Curiae:
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF HOME BUILDERS, HOME BUILDERS ASSOCIATION OF CENTRAL ARIZONA and INTERSTATE NATURAL GAS ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA
Transwestern Pipeline Company, LLC v. 0.15 acre of permanent easement located in Maricopa County et al
as 2:2008cv00452
Defendant:
0.15 acre of permanent easement located in Maricopa County, 0.21 acre of temporary construction easement located in Maricopa County, 0.17 acre of permanent easement located in Maricopa County and others
Plaintiff:
Transwestern Pipeline Company, LLC, Transwestern Pipeline Company, LLC, Transwestern Pipeline Company, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Transwestern Pipeline Company, LLC v. 42.67 Acres of Property Located in Maricopa County et al
as 2:2008cv00012
Plaintiff:
Transwestern Pipeline Company, LLC, Transwestern Pipeline Company, LLC, Transwestern Pipeline Company, LLC and others
Defendant:
42.67 Acres of Property Located in Maricopa County, Pulte Development Corporation, 10,000 West, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
Transwestern Pipeline Company, LLC v. 2.71 acres of permanent easement located in Maricopa County, et al
as 2:2007cv02357
Plaintiff:
Transwestern Pipeline Company, LLC, Transwestern Pipeline Company, LLC, Transwestern Pipeline Company, LLC and others
Defendant:
2.71 acres of permanent easement located in Maricopa County, 3.42 acres of temporary construction easement located in Maricopa County, Buckeye Pollution Control Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
Transwestern Pipeline Company, LLC v. 9.32 acres of permanent easement located in Maricopa County et al
as 2:2007cv02287
Plaintiff:
Transwestern Pipeline Company, LLC and Transwestern Pipeline Company, LLC
Defendant:
9.32 acres of permanent easement located in Maricopa County, 13.99 acres of temporary construction easement located in Maricopa County, Stardust Structured Investments No. 10, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
