Real Property Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Peter Moses Gutierrez v. Amplify Energy Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2021cv01628
Plaintiff: Peter Moses Gutierrez, Jr., Chandralekha Wickramasekaran, Rajaskaran Wickramasekaran and others
Defendant: Amplify Energy Corporation, Beta Operating Company, LLC, Doe Corps and others
Consolidated Plaintiff: Beyond Business Incorporated d/b/a Big Fish Bait & Tackle, Charlie's Gyros, Inc., Jennifer Taylor and others
3Rd Party Plaintiff: Amplify Energy Corp. and SAN PEDRO BAY PIPELINE COMPANY
Cross Defendant: Costamare Shipping Co. S.A., Cosco Beijing, Capetanissa Maritime Corporation and others
3Rd Party Defendant: V. Ships Greece Ltd., V.Ships Greece Ltd., Marine Exchange of Los Angeles Long Beach Harbor doing business as Marine Exchange of Southern California and others
Special Master: Daniel Garrie, James L. Smith and Bradley O'Brien
Petitioner: Christopher Hamm, Randal Klein and Todd Snyder
Intervenor Plaintiff: Markel International Insurance Company, Ltd., Ascot Underwriting Inc., QBE European Co Operations (Lloyds's Syndicate 1036) and others
Intervenor Defendant: Certain Insurers At Lloyd's of London And London Markets Subscribing To Policy No. B0180ME2001399, Mediterranean Shipping Company, S.A., DOES 1-5 and others
Cross Claimant: Marine Exchange of Los Angeles Long Beach Harbor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Torts to Land
Hernandez et al v. Sonoma-Marin Area Rail Transit District (SMART) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2021cv01782
Plaintiff: Michael Caldwell, Phyllis Accornero, Paul Naepflin and others
Defendant: Sonoma-Marin Area Rail Transit District (SMART)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Christopher v. Reaching Fourth Ministries et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2017cv00726
Plaintiff: Carrea Christopher
Defendant: Reaching Fourth Ministries, Buffco Production Oil, Inc., Jason Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Bank of America NA v. Marilyn E Beeney et al
as 8:2012cv01268
Plaintiff: Bank of America NA
Defendant: Garry W Beeney, Marilyn E Beeney and Does
Claremont Homes, Inc v. Bauder et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2012cv02875
Plaintiff: Claremont Homes, Inc
Defendant: Garry Ray Bauder and Kathleen A. Bauder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Rebollo v. Gulley et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv00267
Defendant: Khadija Gulley, Joseph Oleksak, Recontrust Company, N.A. and others
Plaintiff: Eric Rebollo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444 Petition for Removal- Foreclosure
Absalon Velasco, et al v. Security National Mortgage Com, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-17760
Plaintiff - Appellant: ABSALON S. VELASCO, SAY P. VELASCO and GARRY S. VELASCO
Defendant - Appellee: SECURITY NATIONAL MORTGAGE COMPANY, DBA Security National Mortgage Company, Inc., BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AKA Bank of America, MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTERED SYSTEMS INC. and others
Elizabeth Rojas et al v. Provident Savings Bank FSB et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2011cv01247
Defendant: Shelley M Crawford, Danielle T Kussler, Law Office of Kimball Tirey & St John LLP and others
Plaintiff: Eduardo Rojas and Elizabeth Rojas
Garry A Jack et al v. GMAC Mortgage LLC et al
as 2:2011cv05147
Defendant: Does, Executive Trustee Services LLC, GMAC Mortgage LLC and others
Plaintiff: Garry A Jack and Lois J Jack
Velasco et al v. Security National Mortgage Company et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv00239
Plaintiff: Absalon S. Velasco , Say P. Velasco and Garry S. Velasco
Defendant: Security National Mortgage Company, Bank of America, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?