Cases 111 - 120 of 1,223
Charles v. State of California et al
as 3:2022cv00141
Plaintiff:
Marvin L. Charles, Sr.
Defendant:
State of California and Los Angeles, Calif.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Merrill v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
as 3:2022cv00102
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Merrill
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Robins v. Ford Motor Company
as 3:2021cv00165
Plaintiff:
Travis Robins
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
Smith v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
as 3:2022cv00074
Plaintiff:
Scott W. Smith
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
United States of America et al v. FDNM, Fairbanks Daily News Miner, LLC
as 4:2022cv00010
Plaintiff:
United States of America and Falynn Lowe
Defendant:
FDNM, Fairbanks Daily News Miner, LLC
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3730 Qui Tam False Claims Act
Donnellan et al v. Birch, Horton, Bitter, Inc.
as 3:2022cv00117
Plaintiff:
Barry Donnellan and United States of America
Defendant:
Birch, Horton, Bitter, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3731 Fraud
Kelly v. Walmart, Inc.
as 3:2022cv00079
Plaintiff:
James Kelly
Defendant:
Walmart, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Baum v. Quinn
as 3:2022cv00069
Plaintiff:
Robert T. Baum
Defendant:
Dan Quinn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Stuckey v. ABM Industry Groups, LLC
as 3:2022cv00043
Plaintiff:
Joshua Stuckey
Defendant:
ABM Industry Groups, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Johnson v. Doe et al
as 3:2022cv00072
Plaintiff:
Michael Joseph Johnson
Defendant:
John Doe and Jane Roe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
