Cases 21 - 28 of 28
Gary Easley v. City of Morgan Hill, et al
as 11-18086
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GARY D. EASLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF MORGAN HILL, CITY OF SAN JOSE, COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA and others
Tyrone Adams v. Charles Easley, et al
as 11-17619
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TYRONE L. ADAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES L. EASLEY, ANDREW J. PAULSON, CGLS, INC., AKA Lee Road Investors and others
Adams v. Easley et al
as 2:2011cv00826
Plaintiff:
Tyrone L Adams
Defendant:
Charles L Easley, Andrew J Paulson, CGLS Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Green et al v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2010cv01481
Plaintiff:
Marguerite T M Green and Taylor A Oakes
Defendant:
Joseph M Arpaio , Maricopa County Sheriff's Department , Maricopa County Board of Supervisors and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
John Colen v. USA, et al
as 08-55978
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN V. COLEN
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, GEORGE H. BUSH, President of the United States in his individual and official capacity, UNITED STATES TREASURY DEPARTMENT and others
Wesley Simmons, et al v. Navajo County, et al
as 08-15522
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WESLEY SIMMONS, husband and SHARON SIMMONS, wife
Defendant - Appellee:
NAVAJO COUNTY, State of Arizona, NAVAJO COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, governing board of Navajo County, Arizona, GARY BUTLER, Sheriff of Navajo County and others
Amicus Curiae:
ARIZONA TRIAL LAWYERS ASSOCIATION and APACHE COCHISE
John V. Colen v. United States of America The et al
as 5:2007cv01359
Plaintiff:
John V Colen
Defendant:
United States of America The, George H Bush, George H Bush and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Rogers, et al v. Sacramento County, et al
as 2:2003cv01658
Plaintiff:
Gene L Rogers and USA
Defendant:
Sacramento County , Sacramento County Board of Supervisors , - - Sacramento County Department of Human Assistance, - and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
