Cases 31 - 40 of 396
Hardy v. Toyota Motor Sales USA Incorporated
as 2:2018cv00521
Plaintiff:
Steven P Hardy
Defendant:
Toyota Motor Sales USA Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Remy McCarthy et al v. Toyota Motor Corporation et al
as 8:2018cv00201
Plaintiff:
Robert Phillips, Remy McCarthy and Rajdave Bhandari
Defendant:
Toyota Motor Corporation, Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. and Doe Defendants
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Jevdet Rexhepi, Kathleen Ryan-Blaufuss, Cathleen Mills and others
Special Master:
Patrick A Juneau
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
X.V. v. Toyota Motor Sales U.S. A., Inc.
as 2:2017cv03434
Defendant:
Toyota Motor Sales U.S. A., Inc.
Plaintiff:
X. V.
J. D. v. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc.
as 2:2017cv03428
Plaintiff:
J. D.
Defendant:
Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc.
K. I. v. Toyota Motor Sales U.S.A., Inc.
as 2:2017cv03433
Plaintiff:
K. I.
Defendant:
Toyota Motor Sales U.S.A., Inc.
Firooz v. Takata Corporation et al
as 3:2017cv00867
Plaintiff:
David Firooz
Defendant:
Takata Corporation, TK Holdings Inc., Toyota Motor Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mary Ann Lombardi v. Toyota Motor Sales U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 8:2017cv00215
Plaintiff:
Mary Ann Lombardi
Defendant:
Toyota Motor Corporation, Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing North America, Inc., Toyota Motor Manufacturing Kentucky, Inc. and others
Lisa Krause v. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A, Inc.
as 2:2016cv08011
Plaintiff:
Lisa Krause
Defendant:
Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A, Inc.
Wanda Dowell v. Toyota Motor Corp et al
as 8:2016cv01650
Plaintiff:
Wanda Dowell
Defendant:
Toyota Motor Corp, Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing North America Inc, Toyota Motor North America Inc and others
Albert Heber v. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc.
as 8:2016cv01525
Plaintiff:
Albert Heber
Defendant:
Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
