Cases 31 - 40 of 2,696
Rabago v. Mazel
as 2:2024cv00356
Plaintiff:
William Rabago
Defendant:
Laura Mazel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Auto Negligence
William Mahaffey v. Keenan and Associates
as 2:2024cv01288
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM MAHAFFEY
Defendant:
KEENAN & ASSOCIATES and Keenan and Associates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Phillips v. Williams et al
as 2:2024cv00318
Plaintiff:
Carlisha Phillips
Defendant:
Darryl Williams and Louderback Logistics, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Murphy v. Wedan
as 6:2024cv00273
Plaintiff:
James M. Murphy
Defendant:
Richard William Wedan
Petitioner:
Oliver Wisco
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Williams v. Monsanto Company
as 3:2024cv00767
Plaintiff:
Debby Williams
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Long v. Cook Incorporated et al
as 3:2024cv05090
Plaintiff:
Janelle Long
Defendant:
Cook Incorporated, Cook Medical Incorporated, Cook Medical LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lasha v. Cosby
as 2:2024cv00214
Plaintiff:
Chelan Lasha
Defendant:
William Cosby, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Palmer v. Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha (NYK Line) et al
as 4:2024cv00309
Plaintiff:
William Palmer
Defendant:
Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha (NYK Line), Ocean Network Express Pte, Ltd,, M/V NYK Vesta and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Diggs et al v. General Motors LLC
as 3:2024cv00227
Plaintiff:
William Purnell Diggs and Japanese Concepts International, Inc.
Defendant:
General Motors LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Williams v. Walmart, Inc
as 2:2024cv00062
Plaintiff:
Kathi Williams
Defendant:
Walmart, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
