Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Monster Cable Products, Inc., et al v. Ely Eddi, et al
as 13-15699
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MONSTER CABLE PRODUCTS, INC. and MONSTER, LLC
Defendant - Appellant:
ELY EDDI, DIGITAL DATA DEVICES, INC. and DIGITAL IN THE HOUSE, INC.
Monster Cable Products, Inc., et al v. Ely Eddi, et al
as 13-15599
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MONSTER CABLE PRODUCTS, INC. and MONSTER, LLC
Defendant - Appellee:
ELY EDDI, DIGITAL DATA DEVICES, INC. and DIGITAL IN THE HOUSE, INC.
Defendant:
JEFF FELDMAN
Monster Cable Products, Inc. et al v. Feldman et al
as 3:2012cv00250
Plaintiff:
Monster Cable Products, Inc. and Monster, LLC
Defendant:
Ely Eddi , Digital Data Devices, Inc. and Digital in the House, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Monster Cable Products, Inc. et al v. Feldman et al
as 4:2012cv00250
Plaintiff:
Monster Cable Products, Inc. and Monster, LLC
Defendant:
Jeff Feldman, Ely Eddi, Digital Data Devices, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Washington State v. AU Optronics Corporation et al
as 3:2010cv05711
Plaintiff:
Washington State
Defendant:
AU Optronics Corporation , AU Optronics Corp America , Chimei Innolux Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Washington State v. AU Optronics et al
as 2:2010cv01460
Plaintiff:
Washington State
Defendant:
AU Optronics, AU Optronics Corp America, Chimei Innolux Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Granich v. LG Philips LCD Company, Ltd. et al
as 2:2007cv00296
Plaintiff:
Richard Granich
Defendant:
LG Philips LCD Company LTD, LG Philips LCD America, Inc, Samsung Electronics Company, Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Purdy v. LG Philips LCD Company LTD et al
as 2:2007cv00220
Plaintiff:
Timothy J Purdy
Defendant:
LG Philips LCD Company LTD, LG Electronics, Inc., LG Philips LCD America, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
