Cases 61 - 66 of 66
Eggart v. ALS Enterprises Inc et al
as 2:2009cv00107
Plaintiff:
Robert Eggart
Defendant:
ALS Enterprises Inc, Cabela's Incorporated, Cabela's Wholesale Inc and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Saylor v. Chicago Title Insurance Company et al
as 8:2008cv01306
Plaintiff:
Tigranuhi Saylor
Defendant:
Chicago Title Insurance Company, Tracy Robinson, Steven C. Porath and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Waidzunas et al v. Hewlet-Packard Co
as 5:2008cv05081
Plaintiff:
Lance Waidzunas, Michael Mann, Tyler Burgert and others
Defendant:
Hewlet-Packard Co
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Nancy Priddy et al v. EMC Mortgage Company, Inc
as 2:2008cv00157
Plaintiff:
Nancy Priddy, Mary Anne Den Bok, Sean Den Bok and others
Defendant:
EMC Mortgage Company, Inc and EMC Mortgage Company, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Fraud
Mills v. Blackburn et al
as 2:2007cv03019
Plaintiff:
Wylie Mills
Defendant:
Buddy Blackburn, William Bourgois, Ruth Reukauf and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Lehman Brothers Bank v. Beverly Hills Estate, et al
as 2:2003cv02702
Defendant:
Nicole LaViolette, J Gregory Van Orman, A-1 Appraisal Service and others
Cross Defendant:
Charles Elliott Fitzgerald, Wilshire Equipment Rentals, Inc, Beverly Hills Developement Corporation and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Gregory Van Orman, Eoin Kreditor, John Greg Van Orman and others
Petitioner:
John Z. Jeppesen, Hansen & Associates, Gerald M Friedman and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
RBC Mortgage Company of California and RBC USA Holdco Corporation
Intervenor:
Harriet Jasper, - and Harold Jasper, -
Claimant:
D B Krauter
Counter Defendant:
Lehman Brothers Bank FSB
Plaintiff:
Juan Gonzalez
Receiver:
David J Pasternak
Not Classified By Court:
Lawrence A Brockman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
