Cases 91 - 100 of 127
Muth v. Ada County Sheriff's Dept et al
as 1:2011cv00461
Plaintiff:
Michael S. Muth
Defendant:
Ada County Sheriff's Department , Ada County , David Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cusack v. Reinke et al
as 1:2011cv00303
Defendant:
Brent D Reinke, Department of Corrections, Kevin Kempf and others
Plaintiff:
Mary Cusack and C.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DeWitt v Walgreen Co
as 1:2011cv00263
Plaintiff:
Edwin M DeWitt
Defendant:
Walgreen Co. and John or Jane Does I-V
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
No Limits Christian Ministries, Inc. v. City of Mountain Home et al
as 1:2011cv00255
Plaintiff:
No Limits Christian Ministries, Inc.
Defendant:
City of Mountain Home , Bonnie Harper , Russ Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Misetich v. Kootenai County et al
as 2:2011cv00215
Plaintiff:
Mica Ann Misetich
Defendant:
Kootenai County, Rocky Watson, Travis F Chaney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Conforti v. State of Idaho et al
as 1:2011cv00197
Plaintiff:
Michael James Conforti
Defendant:
State of Idaho and John and Jane Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Sadid v. Idaho State University et al
as 4:2011cv00103
Plaintiff:
Habib Sadid
Defendant:
Idaho State University , Arthur Vailas , Richard Jacobsen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Kootenai County et al
as 2:2011cv00033
Plaintiff:
Theodore D Harris
Defendant:
Kootenai County , Rocky Watson , Jane Doe Watson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Matkin v. Reinke et al
as 4:2010cv00574
Plaintiff:
Bobbie Jo Matkin
Defendant:
Brent Reinke, Brian Underwood, Bill C Lloyd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Day et al v. Board of Corrections et al
as 1:2010cv00401
Plaintiff:
Donald Day, Richard Kelly, Milo Beeson and others
Defendant:
Board of Corrections, Johanna Smith, Kathy Nieko and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
