Cases 111 - 120 of 1,927
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00515
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Mendez v. Sony Computer Entertainment America LLC.
as 1:2023cv00333
Plaintiff:
Raul Mendez
Defendant:
Sony Computer Entertainment America LLC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lamkin v. Hutchinson, et al.
as 2:2023cv00273
Plaintiff:
Jay Lamkin
Defendant:
Caleb Hutchinson, Michael Samuel Sheets, City of Coeur D' Alene, Idaho and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00254
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
The State of Idaho v. Walden
as 1:2023cv00288
Petitioner:
Thomas John Walden
Respondent:
The State of Idaho
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Van Hook v. State of Idaho et al
as 1:2023cv00259
Plaintiff:
Ronald Van Hook
Defendant:
State of Idaho, Judge Beaver, Judge McKee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Crow v. State of Idaho, et al.
as 3:2023cv00263
Plaintiff:
Chad Crow
Defendant:
State of Idaho, County of Lewis, Jason Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hardy v. Kish, et al.
as 1:2023cv00306
Plaintiff:
Avalon Hardy
Defendant:
Michael Kish, Troy DeBie, Kyle Card and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Souther v. Nez Perce Tribe Judicial Services
as 3:2023cv00246
Defendant:
Nez Perce Tribe Judicial Services and Nez Perce Tribal Court
Plaintiff:
Chere Souther
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Martinez v. Albright et al
as 4:2023cv00211
Plaintiff:
Michael Andrew Martinez
Defendant:
Sage Albright, Brandon Anderson and City of Idaho Falls
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
