Cases 11 - 20 of 40
Arthur Hooks v. Stephanie Lalonde, et al
as 22-15082
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ARTHUR HOOKS
Defendant / Appellee:
STEPHANIE LALONDE, MICHAEL ALLEN, MITCHELL LANDRY and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00052
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00136
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hooks v. Lalonde et al
as 2:2022cv00028
Plaintiff:
Arthur Hooks
Defendant:
Stephanie Lalonde, Michael Allen, Mitchell Landry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Van Hook v. State of Idaho et al
as 1:2021cv00199
Defendant:
ALPS- Property and Casualty Insurance Company, State of Idaho, Judges of the Idaho Third judicial District Collectively and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Van Hook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv02945
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Washington et al v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 4:2021cv00787
Plaintiff:
Mr. Keith H. Washington, San Francisco Bay View National Black Newspaper, Malik and others
Defendant:
Maria Richard, The GEO Group, Inc., William Gomez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hook, et al., v. City of Redding, et al.,
as 2:2020cv02365
Plaintiff:
Jonson Tyler Hook and Nicole Hook
Defendant:
Travis Braud, Nolan Guiducci, Kurtis Stenderup and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv02409
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Eric Martinez v. County of Riverside et al
as 5:2020cv00013
Defendant:
Sandra L. Farris, Westwind Enterprises, Ltd., Cynthia A. Thielhard and others
Plaintiff:
Eric Martinez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
