Cases 11 - 20 of 28
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015at01137
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv02282
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Adam et al v. Brzyscz et al
as 2:2014cv02795
Plaintiff:
Sara Adam , Jesse Heredia , Isabella H. and others
Defendant:
Bret Brzyscz, City of Roseville, County of Placer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adam et al v. Brzyscz et al
as 2:2014at01514
Plaintiff:
Sara Adam , Jesse Heredia , Isabella Heredia and others
Defendant:
Bret Brzyscz, City of Roseville, County of Placer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Travis v. City of Roseville Police Department et al
as 2:2014cv00087
Plaintiff:
Len Travis
Defendant:
City of Roseville Police Department and William Kanada
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Travis v. City of Roseville Police Department et al
as 2:2014at00045
Plaintiff:
Len Travis
Defendant:
City of Roseville Police Department and William Kanada
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv02150
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Guthrie, et al. v. Roseville, et al.
as 2:2013cv01505
Plaintiff:
Victoria Guthrie and Matthew Tullgren
Defendant:
City Of Roseville, Tom Cabral, Daniel Hahn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fajman v. City of Roseville et al
as 2:2012at01002
Defendant:
City of Roseville, Roseville Police Department, Officer D. stokes and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Fajman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Fajman v. City of Roseville et al
as 2:2012cv01895
Defendant:
City of Roseville, Roseville Police Department and D. Stokes
Plaintiff:
Michael Fajman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
