Cases 11 - 17 of 17
United African-Asian Abilities Club v. EQR Hampshire Place, LP et al
as 2:2015cv07774
Defendant:
Does and EQR-Hampshire Place, LP
Plaintiff:
United African-Asian Abilities Club
Keith Judd, et al v. Barack Obama, et al
as 12-57177
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEITH JUDD, ORLY TAITZ, THOMAS G. MACLERAN and others
Defendant - Appellee:
BARACK OBAMA, in his capacity as a candidate on the ballot for the US President in 2012 election, NATALIE E. TENNANT, in her capacity of West Virginia Secretary of State, DEBRA BOWEN, in her capacity of California Secretary of State and others
Keith Judd et al v. Barack Obama et al
as 8:2012cv01888
Defendant:
Michael Astrue, John Avlon, Ballot Law Commission of State of New Hampshire and others
Plaintiff:
David Farrar, Keith Judd, Leah Lax and others
Keith Judd et al v. Barack Obama et al
as 8:2012cv01507
Defendant:
Michael Astrue, John Avlon, Ballot Law Commission of State of Hew Hampshire and others
Plaintiff:
David Farrar, Keith Judd, Leah Lax and others
Pamela Barnett, et al v. Barack Obama, et al
as 10-55084
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PAMELA BARNETT, Captain, ALAN KEYES, Ph. D., Ambassador, RICHARD NORTON BAUERBACH, Lieutenant Colonel and others
Defendant - Appellee:
BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, MICHELLE L.R. OBAMA, HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON, Secretary of State and others
Wiley Drake, et al v. Barack Obama, et al
as 09-56827
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILEY S. DRAKE and MARKHAM ROBINSON
Plaintiff:
ALAN KEYES, Ph. D., Ambassador, PAMELA BARNETT, Captain, RICHARD NORTON BAUERBACH, Lieutenant Colonel and others
Defendant - Appellee:
BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, MICHELLE L.R. OBAMA, HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON, Secretary of State and others
The State of California et al v. Winbond Electronics Co.
as 3:2007cv02589
Plaintiff:
The State of California, The State of Alaska, The State of Arizona and others
Defendant:
Winbond Electronics Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
