Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2015cv00112
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sargeant et al v. Bell et al
as 9:2015cv00116
Plaintiff:
Mike Sargeant and Ryan Funke
Defendant:
Don Bell , Lake County Sheriff's Office , Lake County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00042
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
M.K. Weeden Construction v. The State of Montana et al
as 6:2013cv00049
Plaintiff:
M.K. Weeden Construction
Defendant:
The State of Montana , Montana Transportation Commission , Kevin Howlett and others
Intervenor:
M.A. DeAtley Construction
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00129
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Fisher v. City of Belgrade et al
as 2:2011cv00033
Plaintiff:
Steven K. Fisher
Defendant:
City of Belgrade , City of Belgrade Police Department , Officer Mike Rassley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2011cv00056
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2011cv00015
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Western Montana Chapter for the Prevention of Elder Abuse v. Mineral County et al
as 9:2009cv00104
Plaintiff:
Western Montana Chapter for the Prevention of Elder Abuse, Western Montana Chapter for the Prevention of Elder Abuse, Western Montana Chapter for the Prevention of Elder Abuse and others
Defendant:
Mineral County, Hugh Hopwood, Clyde Dill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
