Cases 21 - 30 of 165
Belknap v. United States et al
as 3:2021cv01152
Plaintiff:
Craig Belknap
Defendant:
United States, Oregon State and Google
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Avery v. United States of America
as 3:2021cv00578
Plaintiff:
Robert Christopher Avery
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Kent v. Office of the Inspector General et al
as 3:2021cv00290
Defendant:
Office of the Inspector General and United States Department of the Interior
Plaintiff:
Samuel James Kent
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Walker v. United States Department of Agriculture et al
as 1:2021cv00126
Defendant:
Jay DeLapp, United States Department of Agriculture, Vicki L. Walker and others
Plaintiff:
Angie Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Swint et al v. United States et al
as 1:2020cv02144
Defendant:
Dish Network, United States, YouTube and others
Plaintiff:
Robert James Swint and Chrystal Marie Meyer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Pearson v. United States of America et al
as 6:2020cv01974
Defendant:
Ex-President Donald Trump, President Joe Biden and United States of America
Plaintiff:
Nicholas D. Pearson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Belknap v. Pennsylvania et al
as 3:2020cv01968
Petitioner:
Craig Belknap
Respondent:
United States, Wisconsin State, Pennsylvania State and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Campbell v. United States of America
as 3:2020cv01769
Plaintiff:
Dave Campbell
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pettibone et al v. Trump et al
as 3:2020cv01464
Plaintiff:
Fabiym Acuay, Nichol Denison, Duston Obermeyer and others
Defendant:
John Does 1-200, United States Marshals Service, Gabriel Russell and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
United States of America v. Carmer
as 6:2020cv01423
Defendant:
Kathie Carmer
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
