Cases 21 - 30 of 33
Still v. Schmidt et al
as 3:2012cv00084
Plaintiff:
Jacob T. Still
Defendant:
Joseph D. Schmidt, Steven Brunger, Barnhardt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Drussell v. Turnbull et al
as 3:2012cv00057
Plaintiff:
Shawn D. Drussell
Defendant:
Craig Turnbull, Clifton Simmons, Mary Sandy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Proctor v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 3:2011cv00051
Plaintiff:
Bradley D. Proctor
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America , William Crane, Virginia Cox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. City of Dillingham Police Dept et al
as 3:2011cv00048
Plaintiff:
Stephen Delano Davis
Defendant:
City of Dillingham Police Dept, D. McIntire and Mike Barnett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lockhart v. The Municipality of Anchorage et al
as 3:2010cv00283
Plaintiff:
Jimmie D. Lockhart, Sr.
Defendant:
The Municipality of Anchorage, Justin Shoffner and Attorneys James H. McCullum LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Li v. State of Alaska et al
as 3:2010cv00240
Plaintiff:
Mark M. Li
Defendant:
State of Alaska, Joseph D. Schmidt and Anchorage Police Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Y. v. Matanuska-Susitna Borough School District
as 3:2010cv00187
Plaintiff:
D. Y.
Defendant:
Matanuska-Susitna Borough School District
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
Y. et al v. Matanuska-Susitna Borough School District
as 3:2009cv00179
Plaintiff:
D. Y. and J. Y.
Defendant:
Matanuska-Susitna Borough School District
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794 Job Discrimination (Handicap)
Pomeroy v. State of Alaska
as 3:2009cv00148
Plaintiff:
Richard D. Pomeroy
Defendant:
State of Alaska
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00027
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
