Cases 31 - 40 of 51
Robinson et al v. Grundy et al
as 2:2014cv00298
Defendant:
Clark County, Robert Grundy, John Martin and others
702)384-0207 (fax:
Everett Graves
Plaintiff:
Janice Robinson and Jawaun Robinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00060
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00750
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00553
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626 Job Discrimination (Age)
Robinson v. Landa et al
as 3:2012cv00525
Defendant:
Lee Dove, Lincoln Fay, Luis Landa and others
Plaintiff:
Gary Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Montgomery v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department et al
as 2:2012cv00817
Defendant:
Travis Chapman, City Council of Clark County, Nevada, City of Las Vegas, Nevada and others
Plaintiff:
Bobby Lee Montgomery
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv01830
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Robinson v. Brooks
as 2:2011cv01666
Defendant:
Bill Brooks
Plaintiff:
James Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wagner v. City Of North Las Vegas et al
as 2:2011cv01067
Defendant:
Richard Cherchio, City Of North Las Vegas, Councilman Robert Eliason and others
Plaintiff:
Dr. Wade Wagner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Barren v. Roger et al
as 2:2011cv00650
Plaintiff:
Gregory D. Barren
Defendant:
R. Kent, T. Robinson, David Roger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
