Cases 41 - 50 of 346
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv00693
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Bondick v. City of Eugene Police, et al.
as 6:2022cv00668
Plaintiff:
Robert Bondick
Defendant:
City of Eugene Police, Lane County District Attorneys Office, Eugene City Prosecutors Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bondick v. Cambridge Real Estate Services, Inc. et al
as 6:2022cv00640
Plaintiff:
Robert Bondick
Defendant:
Cambridge Real Estate Services, Homes For Good, Robin Spencer and others
Cause Of Action: 48 U.S.C. § 1985 Conspiracy/Deprivation Civil Rights
Nix v. Salvation Army Silvercrest Apts.
as 3:2022cv00608
Plaintiff:
Robert E. Nix
Defendant:
Salvation Army Silvercrest Apts.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Payne v. City of Eugene et al
as 6:2022cv00471
Plaintiff:
Anzhelika Payne
Defendant:
City of Eugene, Lane County, Jairo Solorio and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ealy et al v. Redfield et al
as 3:2022cv00356
Plaintiff:
Dr. Henry Ealy, III, Dennis Linthicum, Kim Thatcher and others
Defendant:
Robert Redfield, Rochelle Walensky, Alex Azar and others
United States of America, ex rel v. Linthicum
as 3:2022cv00306
Plaintiff:
United States of America, ex rel, Oregon State Senator Dennis Linthicum, Oregon State Senator Kim Thatcher and others
Defendant:
Robert Redfield, Rochelle Walensky, Alex Azar and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00255
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01850
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2021cv01709
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
