Cases 51 - 60 of 60
Tew v. Federal Bureau of Investigation et al
as 3:2013cv00608
Plaintiff:
Bryan Keith Tew
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigation , Mr Wilson, Ohio Bureau of Workmens Compensation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011at01545
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv02849
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv01368
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011at00741
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Kevin Ezell v. Ohio Bureau Motor Vehicles
as 2:2010cv08673
Plaintiff:
Kevin Ezell
Defendant:
Ohio Bureau Motor Vehicles
Norman et al v. Supreme Court of Ohio et al
as 8:2010cv01561
Defendant:
Board on the Unauthorized Practice of Law of the Supreme Court of Ohio, Columbus Bar Association, Lynne Day and others
Plaintiff:
Heritage Marketing and Insurance Service Inc and Jeffrey Norman
The State of California et al v. Winbond Electronics Co.
as 3:2007cv02589
Plaintiff:
The State of California, The State of Alaska, The State of Arizona and others
Defendant:
Winbond Electronics Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Jeffrey Miles Keeran v. Warren County of Ohio Sheriffs Office et al
as 2:2007cv01773
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Miles Keeran
Defendant:
Warren County of Ohio Sheriffs Office and The Ohio State Patrol
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2003cv02817
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Objector:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Miscellaneou:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
