Cases 61 - 70 of 98
Hicks v. State of Idaho
as 6:2015cv00995
Plaintiff:
Michael Eugene Hicks
Defendant:
State of Idaho
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Kelly v. City of Eugene, et al
as 6:2015cv00875
Defendant:
City of Eugene, Eugene Police Department, Officer Barry Rager and others
Plaintiff:
Jane Kelly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McFarland v. Eugene Police Department et al
as 6:2015cv00158
Defendant:
Eugene Police Department, L.T.D. and Probation
Plaintiff:
Jerry McFarland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Doe et al v. City of Eugene et al
as 6:2015cv00154
Defendant:
Jennifer Bills, City of Eugene and Pete Kerns
Plaintiff:
Jean Coe and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kohler v. City of Eugene et al
as 6:2014cv01879
Defendant:
City of Eugene, Eugene Police Department, Peter Kerns and others
Plaintiff:
Kashon Nathaniel Kohler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Strong et al v. City of Eugene et al
as 6:2014cv01709
Defendant:
Dave Burroughs, City of Eugene, John Does and others
Plaintiff:
Darrell Lynn Byers, Ronald L. Peterson, Rebecca Strong and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Boyd v. City of Eugene, Oregon et al
as 6:2014cv01273
Plaintiff:
Marc Boyd
Defendant:
City of Eugene and Jed Mcguire
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Bobo v. Eugene Mission
as 6:2014cv01199
Plaintiff:
Charles Lewis Bobo
Defendant:
Eugene Mission
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clark v. City of Eugene, Oregon et al
as 6:2014cv01103
Defendant:
City of Eugene, Oregon, Alex Gardner, Lane County, Oregon and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew G. Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wyatt v. People's Republic of China et al
as 3:2013cv01685
Defendant:
Baidu.Com Inc. and People's Republic of China
Plaintiff:
Eugene Wyatt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
