Cases 61 - 70 of 102
Yellen v. United States of America et al
as 1:2014cv00134
Plaintiff:
Mike Yellen
Defendant:
United States of America, State of Hawaii , Neil Abercrombie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00057
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Ogeone v. United States of America
as 1:2013cv00564
Plaintiff:
Galina Ogeone
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Lorenzo et al v. State of Hawaii et al
as 1:2013cv00568
Petitioner:
Windyceslau D. Lorenzo and United States of America
Defendant:
State of Hawaii, Neil Abercrombie and John and Jane Does 1-50
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00177
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791 Job Discrimination (Rehabilitation Act)
Doe v. United States of America et al
as 1:2012cv00640
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
United States of America, Richard Seaman and Doe Defendants 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Novak et al v. United States of America et al
as 1:2012cv00638
Plaintiff:
Patrick Novak , Daniel Rocha , Larry Kenner and others
Defendant:
United States of America and Does 1 - 1000
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Yellen v. United States Post Office, Hawaii
as 1:2012cv00519
Petitioner:
Mike Yellen
Respondent:
United States Post Office, Hawaii
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Williams v. United States Government, et al.
as 1:2012cv00375
Plaintiff:
Eric G. Williams
Defendant:
Eric K. Shinseki
Respondent:
United States Government
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00125
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
