Cases 1 - 10 of 252
Collins v. County of Alameda et al
as 3:2024cv03283
Plaintiff:
Clayton Collins
Defendant:
County of Alameda, John Jay, Rick Cocanour and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv02995
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Roberson v. Alameda County
as 3:2024cv02106
Plaintiff:
Jahbree Roberson
Defendant:
Alameda County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Roberson v. Alameda County
as 4:2024cv02054
Plaintiff:
Jahbree Roberson
Defendant:
Alameda County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McGee v. Alameda County Sheriff Department
as 3:2024cv00949
Plaintiff:
Anthony McGee
Defendant:
Alameda County Sheriff Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thompson v. Dublin Police Services et al
as 4:2024cv00475
Plaintiff:
Micheal Thompson
Defendant:
Dublin Police Services, Alameda County Sheriffs Department and Scott Brandon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00131
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Ou-Young v. Alameda County Sheriff's Office, et al
as 3:2023cv06597
Plaintiff:
Kuang-Bao Paul Ou-Young
Defendant:
Alameda County Sheriff's Office, Merrick B. Garland, Gregory J. Ahern and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv06454
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Garred Norman v. State Bar of California, et al
as 23-16105
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GARRED F. NORMAN
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA, ALAMEDA COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION, BAY AREA LEGAL AID and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
